Harvard economic professor Greg Mankiw is surprised that Barack Obama is not using a SEP-IRA to put some of his book royalties into a tax-deferred account. Greg looked at the tax return released by the Senator and notes that he has about half a million dollars of book royalty income, but the tax return does not show a contribution to a SEP-IRA.
A SEP-IRA is an IRA for self-employed people. I have one, and it's great. The contribution limits are much higher than for a regular IRA. It reduces your taxable income dollar-for-dollar of your contribution, even if you are in a high tax bracket. And it's a very low-paperwork account. I have mine at a major discount broker, and I use low-cost exchange traded index funds. Another good way to go would be to place it at a mutual fund company. If you have a stock broker or financial planner who is looking at your total investment picture, let that person also handle your SEP-IRA.
If Senator Obama had diverted the maximum amount (for the self-employed, it's about 18 percent, up to a maximum of $45,000) into a SEP-IRA, that money would have grown tax free. He could take it out without penalty--but with regular income tax--anytime after age 59 1/2.
Why wouldn't Senator Obama used a SEP-IRA? Greg Mankiw speculates:
Maybe he is getting bad tax advice. Or maybe he is expecting vastly higher tax rates in the future when the accumulated savings will need to be withdrawn and taxed.
What should you do if you don't expect to be in the same tax bracket when you retire as you're in now? Let's look at some more examples to figure that out.
Lois won’t have much taxable income in her retirement; she’ll be living exclusively on Social Security and a little bit of money from her retirement account. Her tax bracket now is 25 percent, but it will only be ten percent when she retires. If she chose a Roth 401k, her results would be just like Ruthie’s. But if she chose a Regular 401k, look at what happens:
The moral to Lois’s story is: If you will be in a lower tax bracket when you retire, use a regular 401k.
We'll look at one more example to show what you would do if you expect to be in a higher tax bracket during retirement.
Hiram was unemployed for the first half of the year, so his tax bracket will be just 15 percent this year. However, he expects to be in a 25 percent tax bracket when he retires. If he uses a Roth 401k, his result is just like Ruthie’s. However, a regular 401k is a little different.
Hiram’s results show another lesson: If you will be in a higher tax bracket when your retire, use a Roth 401k.
Now, I’ll consider the most realistic case of all. Connie is confused. She isn’t sure what tax bracket she’ll be in when she retires. She listens to the politicians, but she can’t figure out whether they will raise taxes in the future, or cut taxes. She’s concerned about the worst possible case: that she pays taxes that are higher than she has to.
Connie would benefit from “tax diversification.” That means having some of your assets taxed today, and some tomorrow. Connie’s best strategy is to use both a regular and a Roth 401k, or to make her decision so that with her other investments, she is tax diversified. She won’t make the best possible choice, but she guarantees that she’ll be better off than if she made the worst possible choice. The final lesson about regular 401ks and Roth 401ks:Reduce your risk by having assets in different tax categories.
You are not logged in. Log in or create an account.
![]()
Click here to sign up for our monthly newsletter delivered via email.
![]()
Easier to Sell Company Stock in Your 401k
401k Plans' Investment Allocation: Too Conservative in the Rebound
Postponing Retirement Because of Your 401k Account?
Many Companies Restoring 401k Match
401k Contribution Limits for 2010
401k Investing: If You Didn't Panic, Then Rebalance
![]()